Completely lost in wikimedia - part 1
- 2006-07-21
-
Write a full post in response to this!
Who doesn’t know about Wikipedia by now? It is probably the largest collaborative free-licensed project on the web. Now a wiki is basically a web page that many people write and edit. The whole idea sounds a bit dubious really, but when the distinguished journal NATURE published an article comparing Wikipedia to Encyclopedia Britannica online, they found that Wikipedia was pretty accurate although Britannica was more accurate overall.
Wikipedia is updated by individuals who write on subjects that interest them. Because of this Wikipedia has pretty good coverage of popular culture and rapidly changing subjects such as computing.
But why does Wikipedia work better than other collaborative projects? The mission of Wikipedia is not too much different than H2G2, a MUD formed by Douglas Adams (the author of the Hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy) in April 1999. H2G2 was meant to be the repository of all human knowledge. But although H2G2 has a vibrant social community, its edited guide entries come nowhere near the 1,266,000 + articles of Wikipedia even though it is two years older.
Both Wikipedia and H2G2 have articles that are added by individuals interested in a topic regardless of their expertise. H2G2 has editors who review articles, and if they meet certain guidelines they elevate them to the edited guide. Almost all Wikipedia articles can be changed almost instantly by any contributor. This makes Wikipedia more succeptable to vandalism than H2G2 where edited articles are fixed in stone. However, this ability to change articles rapidly also means that a summary of the most recent Doctor Who episode can be up on the web the evening that it was first shown on TV.
Is this rapid change what makes wikipedia work so well? What other factors are involved in it’s success. In order to find out what makes Wikipedia tick, I decided to dive right in and become a Wikipedia contributor.
The first thing that I noticed is that the Wikipedia folks are ambitious. Wikipedia is just one project of the Wikimedia foundation. Some other projects include the Wiktionary (a free dictionary and thesaurus), Wikibooks (for textbooks and manuals), Wikinews, Wikiquote, Wikimedia commons (an image and other media repository), and Wikisource (a free content library of public domain documents). They also have editions in over 150 different languages.
In the next blogs I plan to try to figure out what makes Wikipedia so successful, and to explain how to contribute to this huge free-licensed project.
Write a full post in response to this!
Similar articles
Do you like this post?
Vote for it!
Copyright information
This entry is (C) Copyright by its author, 2004-2008. Unless a different license is specified in the entry's body, the following license applies: "Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved and appropriate attribution information (author, original site, original URL) is included".
Biography
Rosalyn Hunter: Rosalyn Hunter has been on the internet since before the web was created. Born into a family of instructors, she has made it her life's goal to teach others about the important things in life, such as how to type
- Rosalyn Hunter's posts
- Login or register to post comments
- 3840 reads
- Printer friendly version (unavailable!)




Best voted contents
-
Free software heroes: from Stallman to Google, a list of inspiring individuals who made everything possible
Tony Mobily, 2008-06-15 -
Ian Lynch's take on the BECTA fiasco
Tony Mobily, 2008-06-17 -
The Groklaw effect hits Becta. And yes, I am coining a new term
Tony Mobily, 2008-06-15 -
Mail merge in OpenOffice.org
Michael Crider, 2008-06-17
Similar entries
Buzz authors
All news
Other sites
- The Top 10 Everything (Dave). The good, the bad and the ugly.
- Free Software news (Dave & Bridget). All about free software -- free as in freedom!
- Book Reviews: Illiterarty (Bridget). Book reviews, blogs, and short stories.
Hot topics - last 60 days
-
A future without Microsoft
Tony Mobily, 2008-06-08 -
Vienna failed to migrate to GNU/Linux: why?
Tony Mobily, 2008-06-09 -
Free software heroes: from Stallman to Google, a list of inspiring individuals who made everything possible
Tony Mobily, 2008-06-15 -
Dubious ads in Free Software Magazine
Tony Mobily, 2008-05-25 -
The Bizarre Cathedral - 6
Ryan Cartwright, 2008-05-25
Hot topics - last 21 days
-
Free software heroes: from Stallman to Google, a list of inspiring individuals who made everything possible
Tony Mobily, 2008-06-15 -
The Groklaw effect hits Becta. And yes, I am coining a new term
Tony Mobily, 2008-06-15 -
Is Asus backsliding on GNU/Linux?
Gary Richmond, 2008-06-19 -
Charging for GNU/Linux is not the answer
Ryan Cartwright, 2008-06-15

Dedicated server
The AntiWikipedia
Submitted by antiwikipedia on Sat, 2006-07-22 12:09.
Vote!Everything Wikipedia isn't ... AntiWikipedia!