Free Software Magazine caught in the 3fn shutdown crossfire

Short URL: http://fsmsh.com/3153

FSM Columnist: Trusted

Write a full post in response to this!


This article is necessarily going to be short: I am busy restoring our server from a backup from the 2nd of June. Why? Because 3FN was shut down by the FTC; and yes, 3fn is the hosting company we used and were sponsored by.

We are now hosting the magazine with the angels at OpenHosting, which in this case were a life saver.

They provided a server pretty much instantaneously, and made sure that it would be big enough for both Free Software Magazine and FSDaily. The downtime was so long because we expected things to get back to normal soon. We knew that authorities were involved; at the same time, we didn’t expect the FTC to just /shut down/ a whole internet provider with thousands of servers… but we were wrong.

I have to be honest: I am torn. Free Software Magazine had a /three day downtime/, which for a web site is nothing short of a disaster. This also had a huge cost for us on many levels: are our advertisers going to trust us now? Is the traffic going to be restored?

3FN was apparently helping setting up botnets and the hosting of illegal material, including child pornography. Even worse, one of the tech supports at 3FN was allegedly helping one of the customers set up a botnet on one of the servers. You can find out more about it in the link above.

Now, that’s what 3FN has been charged for. And here lies the problem. They have been accused of very serious crimes, and as a result… they were sent bankrupt. There is no way a hosting company could survive a downtime of twelve days (that’s how long the temporary injunction is).

3FN could be guilty or innocent. Or maybe a mixture of the two. In any case, they were executed without a court case, without a jury, without a way to defend themselves. This is the part that disturbs me.

There /was/ a better way to handle all this. They could have shut down 3FN for 24 hours, and made sure that everybody knew why. They could have taken an image of the hard drives they knew were incriminated, and let them reconnect the network after that. That would have had several consequences:

  • Legitimate customers such as Free Software Magazine would have found out that maybe it could be a good idea to change ISP

  • Non-legitimate customers would have left 3FN in fear of such an event happening again

  • 3FN would have realised the seriousness of the consequences of having illegal activities on their servers

Instead, they took 3FN and put it out of business. And took down countless innocent web sites, some of which — I am sure — didn’t even have a backup.

Many innocent sites were caught in the crossfire. Free Software Magazine and FSDaily were two of them.

I am speechless.

Write a full post in response to this!

2

Do you like this post?
Vote for it!

Copyright information

This entry is (C) Copyright by its author, 2004-2008. Unless a different license is specified in the entry's body, the following license applies: "Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved and appropriate attribution information (author, original site, original URL) is included".

Biography

Tony Mobily: Tony is the founder and the Editor In Chief of Free Software Magazine

Erlik's picture

I was worried

Submitted by Erlik on Mon, 2009-06-08 21:58.

Vote!
0

As you can see I was quite worried by the disappearance of SF daily from the net: http://www.tech-no-media.com/2009/06/is-free-software-daily-dead.html

Welcome Back!

Marco Marongiu's picture

Deja-vue

Submitted by Marco Marongiu on Tue, 2009-06-09 20:34.

Vote!
0

Unfortunately, it's not the first time that things like this happen...

Reading about cloud computing on Wikipedia, I stumbled on this:
When the FBI Raids a Data Center: A Rare Danger.

Isn't it incredible that the rights of the innocents (like FSM and Liquid Motors were) are just neglected?

ciao
--bronto

Kevin Dean's picture

No Incentive

Submitted by Kevin Dean on Mon, 2009-08-24 21:05.

Vote!
0

That's the problem with putting a monopoly like government in charge of something as important as criminal justice.

They're funded by taxes, not customer service. They might be protecting people (and even that is debatable) by prosecuting crimes here, but guilty or innocent, Americans MUST pay to support them. As a result, they can and do walk all over people with no regard to the impact is has on them.

Government is a monopoly on the use of aggressive force. It is any surprise that given that monopoly, they make heavy handed use of it?



CariNet: Cloud computing is a reality.

Other sites

Odiogo

Free Software Magazine uses Apollo, project management and CRM for its everyday activities!