Why do companies outsource?

They outsource because of you: residue from the Dot Com Boom just might destroy life as we know it

Download the whole article as PDF

Short URL: http://fsmsh.com/1334

Write a full post in response to this!


The crusty old geek with 30 years of experience can’t get a word in as Adam, the 19 year old hot-shot system administrator, tells everyone how to do their jobs. “Your opinion really doesn’t matter, dude, you’re like old”, he says, as he adjusts his Linux World t-shirt. As BrokenToothpicks.Com stock soars to $300 a share and its 24 year old high school dropout CEO lashes out against the “old way of doing things”, Adam just might be right. People start to listen to these new brainiacs and Dot Com Rockstars who can do no wrong. Adam thinks he’s God. How can he not? He’s making money hand over fist and plans to retire to a private island just as soon as his options vest. Everyone else must just be an idiot—I mean, come on, how can they work for so long and STILL drive a used Subaru. Adam is the reason that houses are unaffordable, the stock market crashed, unemployment is high, and the bread you bought just the other day has already gone bad.

It takes all kinds

It takes all kinds of people for the world to run. Sometimes, people end up in the same place at the beginning of an evening but start out in completely different worlds. The types of people who ended up being important (or visible) within the Dot Com Boom were either the brilliant minds (wonder kids) with a crystal ball for a mind and ideas coming out of every pore—or the people who weren’t, but were told, nonetheless, that they were brilliant. See, in order to keep everyone happy, everyone was told that they were the best. There didn’t seem to be room for any junior level positions. During the dot com boom, the corporate ladder started at the top. Everyone was a Senior Vice President of their own cubicle.

There is so much that people don’t understand. One of the greatest lessons someone can learn is to know when their input doesn’t matter and someone else just might have better insight into a problem. In the real world, people at the highest level of knowledge in all areas were split organizationally. The techies ran the computer systems, the marketing department was in charge of spreading the word, the executives at the top knew how to keep the company afloat. Usually these areas of expertise were split and everyone understood their role. The system programmer wouldn’t tell the CEO how to run his organization.

All of that changed with the “success” of all these new startup companies. Starting a business became simple. A new “company” running out of an apartment all of a sudden had a market value rivalling 20 year old established companies. The 5 year business plan was now too slow. A CEO with a long term vision was told to speed things up. Senior Vice Presidents from these “successful” new companies were brought in to make things work. Their insight into the new ways to run a company was sought after.

Out went a solid business plan. Out went long term planning. Welcome to the Friday Beer Bash! Welcome to the video game room. Welcome to Nerf gun battles and quirky toys in the main lobby. Meet our new Vice President. Don’t mind the shorts and flipflops. He knows how the new world runs. The blinders went on and companies were magically headed, in all areas of the organization, by the new faces of success. There wasn’t room for anyone who didn’t jump on the bandwagon.

When a technology savvy kid is told that everything they touch turns to gold, what right does he have to think otherwise? When the technology savvy kid decides he’s accomplished all there is to accomplish in his field, who is going to tell him that his Midas touch can’t apply to other aspects of the company? So it begins. The dot com whiz kids invade the business world and show everyone that only their own ideas matter. And as stocks keep hitting new highs, everyone thinks they’re right.

The boom and the bust
The boom and the bust

Values in the old economy

Let’s step back a few years and try to remember the world when your parents graduated and they were ready to enter the job market. Educated (or not), your father walked into his first job at a big stable company. He came in at a junior position and eyed that corner office. “20 years and it just might be mine!”, he thinks. Work hard, show some loyalty, learn from the more experienced co-workers and everything will eventually work itself out. Time—there’s usually a reason that shortcuts aren’t the norm. Modesty—actually realizing that he still had a lot to learn. Patience—good things come to those who wait. Maybe he’ll retire some day and get a nice pension. A 1.4% cost of living increase after a year was appreciated and was cause for celebration. His goals were to provide for his family, himself, and eventually buy a humble home and a new economy car.

There was no such thing as getting rich quick, and money wasn’t wasted on frivolous luxuries. He worked hard for his money and saw no need to throw it away. He understood that you had to pay your dues to gain a full understanding of how things work.

These lessons were passed on to the next generation with a wink and hope that the next generation will work even harder and maybe have a little bit of extra breathing room.

Adam’s generation—focused on wealth, bling-bling, and instant gratification—laughed it all off. Adam knew better. He saw 30 years of work turn into pre-IPO stock options and the promise of a guaranteed retirement right away. Slaving away working for “the man” did not apply to his generation. Moore’s Law states that the speed of a processor doubles every 18 months. Internet Speed. Things moved faster in the new world. Expectations were high. Money grew on trees. Adam’s generation was happy to apply this law to their careers and all the pieces of their lives.

Unfortunately, the same “just do it” mentality had no room for planning, doing things the right way, or any sort of research. People sat down, put together a business plan, a web site, or some sort of bleeding edge architecture and weren’t around to pick up the pieces when things broke. See, they’d be retired in the Bahamas by the time their untested theories would be put to the test. And we let them do it.

I remember working at a company with many lofty goals and guaranteed success. The recruiter, during my interview, told me that everyone was already counting their money before a product had been developed. Venture capital was already there and any options we get would be worth millions. It was a sure thing. When I was interviewed, one clear business plan existed. When I signed the paperwork, the original plan had been scrapped and the company was going in a new direction. When I walked in the door on my first day, the plan had changed again. When I made this observation I was met with shrugs. “The market is dynamic. We’re adapting to it. We need to be on the ball to get the most funding. As soon as we find out what the venture capitalists want, we’ll stick with it”, said the head of the marketing department. He ended up leaving after a few months (and a few new business plans). It had been exactly one year since he had signed on. Part of his ungodly amount of options had vested. It was time to move on to the next place. His plan? No one really knew. See, according to the plan, the first few months was research. The deliverables were all due after 13 months. He left after 12. When the next marketing executive came in to pick up where he left off, he found nothing. The cycle started over again. Everyone seemed to be too scared to question anything anyone was doing or they were left with an angry employee crying about being misunderstood. Think of professional sports. No loyalty, just whining.

I’m under the impression that everyone during the wonderful economic boom we experienced, only knew how to talk and not how actually deliver anything useful. Their justification must have been that if the company itself didn’t do anything, neither did they.

Demand and lowered expectations

As people started to see the potential of the Internet and the New Economy, every kid who knew Linux (you’re senior, an expert, a master after installing it just once, right?) was sought after to help get new money making web sites on the network. All you needed to start a new company was a domain name, a network connection and a stupid idea. Former insurance salesmen (and now current Dot Com CEOs) wanted to quickly hire the Linux kids to set up their new companies for them. As these retired restaurant managers came up with even more ideas (“What if we set up a company that sells mismatched Tupperware online?!”), these former cab drivers (and Dot Com Visionaries) had a smaller and smaller pool of people to pick from. “Ok, so what if he can spell Linux. He might do”, goes through the thrifty minds of the former gun shop owner-turned Internet Entrepreneur.

The goal of all these utterly unqualified web company owners was to set up their web site and think of the ways they would spend their billions and billions of dollars. “Sure kid, you can be a senior engineer. Just get the box up and running.”

Don't miss out on the other pages!
12next ›last »

Write a full post in response to this!

0

Do you like this post?
Vote for it!

Copyright information

Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

Biography

Tom Jackiewicz: Tom Jackiewicz is currently responsible for global LDAP and email architecture at a Fortune 100 company. Over the past 12 years, he worked on the email and LDAP capabilities of the Palm VII, helped architect many large scale ISPs servicing millions of active email users, and audited security for many Fortune 500 companies. Jackiewicz has held management, engineering, and consulting positions at Applied Materials, Motorola, and Winstar GoodNet. Jackiewicz has also published articles on network security and monitoring, IT infrastructure, Solaris, Linux, DNS, LDAP, and LDAP security. He lives in San Francisco’s Mission neighborhood, where he relies on public transportation and a bicycle to get himself to the office-fashionably late. He is the author of Deploying OpenLDAP, published by Apress in November 2004.

admin's picture

Comments from old system

Submitted by admin on Fri, 2006-03-31 11:22.

Vote!
0

From: zed
Url:
Date: 2005-10-05
Subject: entertaining read but not correct

It's telecomminications technology and infrastructure which has allowed offshoring to work.

Already manufacturing of mass-consumer goods had moved 'offshore', to lower-paid workers, 'IT offshoring' is just the same thing. It was just waiting for the right technology (and other factors, like education) to come along to make it ecomonically viable.

It has nothing to do with inexperienced companies going belly up because of incomplete business plans. Or nurf battles. Or even IT out-sourcing, which is just economically driven.

________________________________________

From: anonymous
Url:
Date: 2005-10-07
Subject: laws and unions

if anything this makes me think that employment laws regarding age discrimination - both during the hiring phase and in the workplace - need to be re-evaluated.

also, i wish there was a rise of unions again, especially in the technology space. too many certifications (from large corporations) and not enough ground-roots efforts by the workers. telecommunications had to have it (well, they also needed regulations, which the internet clearly does not).

________________________________________

From: Andre Holliday (SUBSCRIBER!)
Url:
Date: 2005-10-12
Subject: Don't be too quick to let the companies off the hook

Tom makes some good points in this essay. He laments the passing of an era where certain virtues used to thrive; I also miss those days. I'm looking forward to part two, but a little history is in order.

In the 1980s and '90s, quite a few big companies betrayed the loyalty that Tom and his sister observed in their parents toward their employers and work. Merger mania was all the rage, and firing as many workers as possible was looked upon very favorably by Wall Street--the more workers axed, the higher the stock prices climbed. People who had made lifelong contributions to their employers in the form of work well done, consistent progress, high-quality customer service, and who felt a general moral obligation to do right by the companies that had done right by them, were gratuitously cast aside.

As a consequence, the idea of being loyal to companies that engaged in such boorish behavior was viewed as misguided at best. Withholding loyalty from them was indeed a healthy response. Unfortunately, most companies, if not all, were deemed suspect, so that anyone loyal to any company was perceived to be a chump.

As it became more fashionable for companies to "downsize," some people questioned whether the old, tried-and-true fundamentals still applied in this new world of chainsaw management. If some old, venerable firms were succeeding quite well by unceremoniously dumping good, hard-working, loyal employees, was loyalty necessary? could it be a liability? Could a slow and steady pace be too slow to win the race? Why were so many in middle and upper management so eager to dispense with long-term visions that required planning, consistent execution, and a loyal workforce to bring them to fruition--a loyal workforce whose absence could only result in failure? The Adams of this world did not have the power to create this sorry state of affairs.

I suggest that many big, stable companies created this environment, and that they did it by recklessly turning their backs on loyalty and long-term planning, and by pursuing quick riches with willful disregard for the inevitable consequences. I would further suggest that those companies chased the best employees away, because said employees were deemed to have "too-high" salaries, even though they had earned every penny with high productivity, excellent customer service, and--need I say--loyalty. There was a deliberate policy of replacing them with less experienced, nay, inexperienced, workers because they could be paid a pittance. These companies fomented fear, distrust, and nurtured an otherwise poisonous atmosphere, by so shabbily betraying good, solid, reliable, loyal workers.

Now that those companies have apparently killed the golden goose here, they seek it elsewhere, lamenting that our workers are uneducated, unskilled, inexperienced, impatient, have no regard for customer service, and, above all else, lack a sense of loyalty. In this way, they sowed the seed that became Adam, irresponsible and destructive, running away from the mess they had made, leaving suffering in their wake. As bad as Adam may seem, these companies are far worse, because they used to know--and do--better.

If these same companies stay the course they have been on for some twenty-odd years, they will kill whatever golden goose they find in the host countries to which they are so enthusiastically outsourcing everything.

________________________________________

From: Tom Jackiewicz
Url: www.sun4c.net
Date: 2005-11-28
Subject: Comments

Andre,

I'm hopefully going to explore the situation from all sides. You make some good points and that side of things will definitely be taken into account.

I just wanted to place a bit of the blame on my own generation for things because it seems to be too easy to blame everything on the companies -- though they do deserve a hell of a lot of blame.



CariNet: Cloud computing is a reality.