Interview with Kevin Carmony
The creator of Linspire speaks out
Download the whole article as PDF
- 2006-06-14
- Published on web | Easy
-
Write a full post in response to this!
Kevin Carmony is the president and CEO of Linspire. Kevin kindly agreed to answer a few questions, and talk about his new project: Freespire.
In Free Software Magazine, we choose to use the terms “free software” (rather than Open Source) and “GNU/Linux” (rather than Linux). However, this is an interview and answers will be left unedited.
TM: Thanks for the interview Kevin! Well, first of all tell us something about you and Linspire…
KC: Linspire was founded five years ago, and I have been here from the very beginning. Linspire was started in an effort to expose GNU/Linux to the mainstream market by making it polished and easier to use, include support, and then to get it pre-installed on computers at the OEM level.
TM: What does Linspire offer?
KC: Linspire is designed exclusively for use on desktop and laptop computers, particularly for consumers. We don’t offer server or enterprise products, as there are already plenty of great Linux products out there for these areas. Because we focus on the consumer desktop, Linspire is ideally suited for the non-technical computer user who would like to use Linux on their desktop or laptop, and have everything just work from the moment they turn on their computer. For example, Linspire supports MP3, DVD, Windows Media, QuickTime, Flash, Java, and so on, right out of the box.
TM: One of the big features of Linspire is the CNR Service (Click and Run). This client was originally based on APT (Debian’s package manager). CNR has now evolved. Is it still based on APT? Can a “hybrid system” function properly without going through the dependency hell?
KC: Correct. CNR has always been, and still is, based around Debian packaging, including APT. You have always been able to use APT with Linspire. However, you might (as is the case with any Debian-based distro) run into problems if you APT from different pools which are not compatible; this is also true for Debian, Ubuntu, etc. So, in other words, if you CNR from the Linspire CNR Warehouse repository, and then you apt-get from Debian or Ubuntu repositories, you may or may not create dependency problems. Linspire stays pretty close to Debian Sid, but there are so many .deb repositories, you just need to be careful. Our goal is to make sure the CNR Warehouse remains the most inclusive, stable and current repository so there isn’t any need to APT outside of the CNR repository, but there is nothing preventing anyone from doing that.
TM: Is it actually possible for Ubuntu and Debian users to use Linspire’s repository?
KC: Because Linspire was designed for consumers, there wasn’t really any need to offer that. However, with Freespire being used by more traditional Linux users, Freespire certainly needs that level of flexibility. So, starting with the Freespire release, yes, anyone can use APT to pull from all our repositories. However, Ubuntu and Debian users would also need to be careful doing that, just like Linspire users need to use caution when pulling from non-Linspire repositories, as I mentioned earlier.
TM: So, what are the advantages of CNR exactly? And are those advantages only available if the CNR client talks to the CNR server?
KC: A lot of people who aren’t familiar with CNR assume it’s simply a graphical front end for APT, but that’s not at all the case. We’ve spent five years perfecting the CNR system, and it has a couple of dozen big differences from APT. Rather than go into all those differences here, I’d suggest your readers visit this link, where we have an entire page of information on the differences between APT and CNR.
TM: I looked at the charts. You offer, for example, the ability to buy programs, see “charts”, see reviews/screenshots, etc. These are the features that depend on the CNR server, right?
KC: Anyone, even Windows or Mac users, can see the charts and reviews from the website. But yes, buying the commercial software, creating Aisles, our ecommerce system, and so on use the CNR servers.
TM: Could I decide to run a CNR server myself, if I wanted to?
KC: We have no plans on open sourcing the server piece (since this is where the e-commerce lives for the commercial software, etc.), but because CNR uses APT, anyone can easily set up a Debian repository server and use the CNR client if they wished to talk to that server using CNR. Our website and servers are an important part of our business, just like I’m sure Amazon’s, Google’s, eBay, and Yahoo’s are for theirs.
TM: I am sure your company will prosper for many years. However, this does mean that if anything goes wrong, your users won’t be able to access the repositories anymore. How do you address this problem?
KC: We are no different than if “something went wrong” and the Debian repository servers went down. The repositories themselves, for the open source software, can easily be mirrored by anyone. In fact, CNR has a tool built in (called CNR Express) to do just that. We have many Linspire users who keep most of the software they ever use from our Warehouse on their local network drive, this way when they use CNR it rarely even hits our servers but pulls everything from a local drive or network.
TM: Point taken! However, since the server is not free, all that would be lost is the extra information (voting, screenshots, etc.). Is that correct?
KC: That would be like saying if eBay’s servers went down, all that would be lost are the photos of items that were for sale. I think we can agree there is a lot more to the eBay, Google or Yahoo servers than housing content or files. As I said, there are a lot of features to the CNR service Linspire provides. Providing that service is how we stay in business, just like cooking hamburgers is how McDonald’s stays in business. Certainly some parts of the CNR Service can be replaced with apt-get or manual means, but that would take effort on someone’s part to go to that bother. We make money from the CNR service, it’s how we pay our full-time employees. If someone is worried about Linspire not being around, they shouldn’t use the CNR service, just like they shouldn’t use the service of a web provider, email provider, photo hosting, wiki hosting, and so on, if they don’t have confidence that provider will be around or they’re not willing to take the risk of them going away. When I pay someone to watch my dog if I leave town, I have to trust that they’re going to be there with my dog, when I get back in town. If I don’t have that level of trust, I shouldn’t trust them with my dog, and either find someone else, or stay home and watch the dog myself.
TM: I understand that CNR client is one of the main players here. You said that you would release it under a free license. Will that be an OSI approved license?
KC: Most likely. I see no reason why it shouldn’t be. The final decision of exactly which license we’ll be using hasn’t been made yet, largely just because we’ve been busy with other matters, and we don’t need to have this until the Freespire software is released in August.
Write a full post in response to this!
Similar articles
Do you like this post?
Vote for it!
Copyright information
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Biography
- Login or register to post comments
- 8206 reads
- Printer friendly version (unavailable!)




Best voted contents
-
Google App Engine: Is it evil?
Terry Hancock, 2008-04-24 -
The Bizarre Cathedral - 3
Ryan Cartwright, 2008-05-05 -
Free Software Magazine Awards 2008
Tony Mobily, 2008-04-22 -
The Bizarre Cathedral - 2
Ryan Cartwright, 2008-04-27
Similar entries
Buzz authors
All news
From the FSM staff...
- The Top 10 Everything (Dave). The good, the bad and the ugly.
- Free Software news (Dave & Bridget). A site about short stories and writing.
- Book Reviews: Illiterarty (Bridget). Book reviews, blogs, and short stories.
Hot topics - last 60 days
-
Installing an all-in-one printer device in Debian
Ryan Cartwright, 2008-05-05 -
What is the free software community?
Tony Mobily, 2008-03-29 -
Things you miss with GNU/Linux
Ryan Cartwright, 2008-05-01 -
Drigg (the pligg alternative) vs. Pligg: why should people switch?
Tony Mobily, 2008-04-13 -
Why Microsoft should not lose (and free software will still win)
Ryan Cartwright, 2008-04-21


Dedicated server
Outside looking in
Submitted by Terry Hancock on Wed, 2006-06-14 07:20.
Vote!I often feel a little funny commenting on "Value Added" GNU/Linux distros like Linspire, since I'm not really in their market. I jumped ship from the proprietary computer world some time ago, and I was very much drawn to the idea of running a completely free and open system. But then, I'm a professional user of computers, and have used a lot of different systems, so switching wasn't so painful for me as it is for a lot of novice users.
OTOH, I can't find any reason to take issue with what Linspire is doing. I certainly have installed non-free components on GNU/Linux systems in order to get things like Flash or RealMedia to work. Those things were essential on my Mom's system, for example -- and they were not trivial to install on a basic Debian system. So, I imagine that Linspire is for users like my Mom, if they haven't got me to install stuff for them.
It also strikes me as odd that Linspire has been particularly singled out for criticism, when "value add" has been a pretty conventional idea for some time. There are a number of boxed GNU/Linux distributions that have used this approach.
To listen to the criticisms, though, I think the problem is this: a non-free GNU/Linux that skirts the bounds of the free software world, but makes things "easy" is a threat because it's a temptation. I think the people objecting must be like ex-smokers who get upset about smokers, not because of a genuine concern for public health, but because they tempt them to start up their addictions again.
But I feel that if you're really happy with where you're at (and I am so with free software), then it's just not so threatening. And Carmony is, IMHO, probably correct that a successful Linspire, with many Linux desktop users would more likely be a benefit than a hazard to those of us who insist on using free GNU/Linux systems -- that kind of market pressure is useful. True, there also needs to be pressure towards free software itself, but I think there may well be enough of us to create that pressure, so there's no need to go tilting at windmills. Linspire isn't quite playing our game, but I'm having a hard time seeing them as rivals or enemies.
Enderle's articles are pretty scary though: "open source will kill innovation". I think it's the result of a fundamental fallacy, based on the tired assumption that innovation correlates with monetary reward. Free software development models have, IMHO, already proven that's false. Money helps, but free communication helps more.
Linspire newbie
Submitted by Anonymous visitor on Wed, 2006-08-16 01:32.
Vote!You actually have to think of Linspire the same way that we think of AOL. It is geared towards people who want to sit down at their computers and just have everything work. They really don't want to tinker with things unless they are just making something look "prettier". Let's face it AOL didn't actually hurt the Internet. By putting more users onto the Internet they forced companies to think of how to sell things to THOSE users. AOL gave access to the Internet to the people that can't program their vcrs. Linspire is simply packaging things so that those same kinds of people can use Linux. I admit I don't like having to pay a subscription fee to be able to download programs that are free everywhere BUT if I know for a fact that those programs are going to work WITHOUT hassles I might even be so inclined. So I guess I have to say Terry, you are soooooo right! Linspire is a threat to those of us who love to tinker because sometimes after a long day of work or worse, in a panic because we have a deadline, we just want everything to work with no hassles. Linspire is also necessary, like AOL, to get the numbers of people onto it higher to help force the market to develop for Linux as well or even exclusively for that matter. I recently installed Linspire but I did not do any research so I did not know that it was geared towards the desktop user. Who knows, maybe it will do exactly what I want it to do but if not Fedora is still calling my name...
Linux is not being used on the desktop in any large scale way
Submitted by Anonymous visitor on Wed, 2006-08-30 20:14.
Vote!No?
Really?
Are you sure?
Personally, I am in awe of such an intellect who can state the obvious and then get knobbed because he was such a genius.
Carmony wanted people to call him a nut in one of this online blurbs.
So here goes: "Grade A peanut head".
A guy who makes people as uncomfortable as Carmony does NOT make such missteps tryin to be hip and cute. Sort of like Kobe Bryant should NEVER do a SNL sketch about a panty raid. When youre sketchy, you cant afford to.
So far, Carmony went from amusing slick talking snakeoil salesman to a guy I'd rather not trust.
As one of our techs said: "He has all the charisma and believability of Tom Cruise".
And that use of the free speech argument is just precious. Im surprised he didnt say that the ones who are opposed hate america because most of Carmony's putdowns remind me of Stephen Colbert's character.
I dont think there is anything dark and sinister about Enderle's endorsement by Carmony, just amazement that a con man can be so stupid as to needlessly make himself enemies over a hack who brings nothing to the table. There are some names out there, none in the tech media, that you can take a chance with angering some people because they bring some insight but Enderle has proved throughout the years that he has trouble differentiating concepts like open source and open standards and well: his articles speak for himself.
That said, Carmony is a much better writer and speaker than Enderle. He knows all the little tricks, red herrings, misdirections ("See, he does know Linux,he said its not used on the desktop") that are the marks of a good debater/lawyer/bulls*****r.
The majority of the time, the bulls**t works too.
Rich Trema