Free software heroes: from Stallman to Google, a list of inspiring individuals who made everything possible

Free software heroes: from Stallman to Google, a list of inspiring individuals who made everything possible


This article was originally published on "2008-06-15 13:09:55 +0000". I re-read it, and decided that it deserved to be re-published in Free Software Magazine as a tribute to those individual who made GNU/Linux possible. Every field has its own key individuals who donated much of their time to the ideas they believed in. Each one of them is a reminder that it's up to individuals to make a difference -- and to make history. Their work affects large chunks of the world's population, and bring amazing changes to the way we see and experience the world.

The free software world has its own heroes. You probably know a lot of them already; if you don't, you probably use the results of their work on a daily basis.

This article is both a tribute to them, and a summary to those people who are new to the free software world.

Some of the key people

Richard Stallman.. With rms, I don't even know where to start. He started the GNU project, which is a rather important part of the GNU/Linux operating system, in 1983 (that's right: nineteen eighty-three!) and set up the Free Software Foundation in 1985. He wrote the original GNU C compiler--yes, the program used to transform programs from programming language to executable code. He spends most of his time being a political and software activist. If you want to see what dedication is, read his blog and see his beyond-hectic travelling schedule.

Pamela Jones. Talking about dedication, Pamela Jones is the author of Groklaw, arguably the web site that saved GNU/Linux and free software in general from SCO/Microsoft's claws. Pamela Jones is a truly outstanding individual. She authored around 1000 articles over the last 3 years--and a lot of them are full-length pieces which resonated loudly in the IT industry as a whole.

Linus Torvards.. He wrote Linux, the kernel, without which the GNU utilities wound't have anything to run on. Linus' kernel was timely, and was released under the GPL (written by Richard Stallman) in 1991. Linux is a very important part of the GNU/Linux project.

Mark Shuttleworth. He's the founder of Canonical, which created Ubuntu Linux. The short version of Shuttleworth's story is simple: he made a small fortune selling Thawte (which made digital certificates) to VeriSign. He then went through the Russian astronaut training programme and went to space. He came back, and founded Canonical in order to create Ubuntu Linux, which is arguably the most popular and innovative GNU/Linux distribution aimed at end users.

Larry Page and Sergey Brin. They created Google. Regardless of the silly spelling mistake, you may have heard of it: you type a sentence in their web page, and you magically get a list of relevant pages as a result... you should check it out if you haven't yet. Although Google is not a free software company, and a lot of their software is indeed proprietary, they still released vast amount of free software and (more importantly) contributed to the creation of free standards that are free software friendly (think of OpenSocial vs. Facebook, or Android vs iPhone/Windows Mobile).

Bob Young and Matthew Szulik. Bob Young created Red Hat, one of the most successful free software companies. Under young's leadership, Red Hat established itself as the leading GNU/Linux distribution in the server space. Red Hat's contributions to the Linux kernel and free software in general are immense. Matthew Szulik was Red Hat's CEO after Young, and made the company even stronger. More importantly, Szulik had an historical (and unconfirmed) dinner with Steve Ballmer, Microsoft's CEO, who tried his best to convince him to enter a compromising patent agreement with Microsoft. Szulik said "no", although the agreement would have probably been very lucrative for Red Hat. Signing it would have crippled the free software world.

Jimmy Wales. He is the creator of another web site you might have heard of: Wikipedia. I don't need to put a link here: just type anything in Google (see above: that's the fancy search page I talked about a minute ago), and you'll probably find one or more Wikipedia pages listed... Wikipedia's software is available under a free license (GPL). Yes, that's the same license created by Richard Stallman (see above). While Wikipedia itself is not free software, it was one of the first times (if not the first time) that the free software philosophy was applied to a non-technical field. And it was immensely successful.

Lawrence Lessig. He created the Creative Commons licenses, which allow artists to release their works under licenses that have the same principles as free software licenses.

Sir Tim Berners-Lee. He invented the Wold Wide Web. And released the specifications (HTTP and HTML) for free, rather than asking companies and developers to enter unacceptable agreements on supposedly non-discriminatory terms. Without him, the internet today could be dominated by MSN- and AOL-like proprietary protocols and chaos. And I mean: chaos.

Blake Ross. He's the man who, as a teen-ager (in 2003), realised that the free software movement was losing the web browser world because there wasn't a lean, free web browser available. So, he forked Mozilla and created another piece of software you might have already heard of: Firefox. The rest is history. In fact, it's a history with a 25% market share, which is impressive if you consider that each copy of Firefox needs to be downloaded and installed, as opposed to using what comes with Windows directly.

Dries Buytaert. The author of Drupal, one of the greatest Content Management Systems out there. (Yes, I am biased, since I am a Drupal developer.) Most people aren't Drupal users; however, a lot of people are users of web sites that use Drupal as their backend.

Keith Packard. He was the force behind XOrg, a fork of XFree86. GNU/Linux today has a fantastic graphic subsystem thanks to him. This interview with Keith Packard, which dates back to 2003, explains part of what happened. Note that in the interview nothing was set in stone just yet, and XOrg was still more or less an "idea". Today, it's a strong reality in the free software world.

Bram Cohen. The mathematical genius creator of BitTorrent. Unlike pretty much everybody else, he released the specifications and the reference implementation of his protocol for free. BitTorrent proved to be crucial for free software, since it made the download of ever-growing distributions possible. Other players (see: the RIAA) are not as impressed by the protocol's potential.

Michael Tiemann. He founded Cygnus back in 1989. Cygnus Solutions was one of the first attempts to "make money" out of free software. Tiemann also wrote the GNU C++ compiler and worked on the GNU C compiler and debugger, which are crucial pieces of software that change the IT world.

The world without them

What would the world be like if those individuals had taken a plumbing career instead? You can argue that if they hadn't done it, well, somebody else may have. That word "may" is the problem here. (This also brings the more the more theoretical problem of the "near-miss list": the list of people who did take a plumbing career instead of helping the world, but that's a different story...)

Without Pamela Jones, many (including me) believe that the SCO case against Linux could have taken a much nastier turn. Without Stallman, the free software movement wouldn't be nearly as organised and strong. Without Shuttleworth, a proprietary GNU/Linux distribution could have become the market leader (it was already happening, slowly, with Linspire). Without Larry Page and Sergey Brin there would be no Google. No Summer of Code. No Android. No OpenSocial--and the list goes on and on. Without Bob Young and Matthew Szulik, there might be no clear leader in the GNU/Linux server market, or--worse -- Red Hat might have given in to Microsoft's pressure to enter a disastrous patent deal. Without Jimmy Wales there would be no Wikipedia. Without Lawrence Lessig, tons of artworks wouldn't be available through the World Wide Web. And by the way, without Sir Tim Berners-Lee there would be no World Wide Web. Without Blake Ross, you might have to use Interenet Explorer to do anything online. Without Dries Buytaert, Drupal wouldn't exist. Without Keith Packard, we might be stuck with the monolithic, sort-of-free-but-not-quite XFree86.

Without these individuals, basically, the world would be a much, much grimmer place to live in.

Care joining the club?

By reading this article, you probably get the idea: each one of those individuals is smart, dedicated, and willing to sacrifice big chunks of his personal life in order to improve the world.

One of the fantastic things about free software is that there is no bar. Anybody can enter it. Your name could well be in this list. All you need, is phenomenal amounts of work and passion for your field--whichever that is.

I am not in that list, although I always thought I'd love to be be. I am doing my best with Free Software Magazine, and every time I am tired, or lack inspiration, I look up to those who made this world possible--and strive to do just as much, just as well.

We mortals might not go as far as Sir Tim Berners-Lee or Richard Stallman or Pamela Jones. But... we can only try.

Category: 
Tagging: 

Comments

jblackhall's picture
Submitted by jblackhall on

I would've liked to have seen Matt Mullenweg on this list. He's a very strong advocate for free software. Maybe next time...

hunger's picture
Submitted by hunger on

I admire and respect Google for much of what they have done and are associated with, including the examples cited in this article. But, this is a company that has actively supported DRM and continues to assist in censorship of the Internet. They do cool things too, sure, but "hero"es?

hunger's picture
Submitted by hunger on

... it's also worth noting that much of Google's software (Google Earth, Picasa, Google Talk) is proprietary software (not free software)!

Ryan Cartwright's picture

from TFA (emphasis mine)..

Although Google is not a free software company, and a lot of their software is indeed proprietary, they still released vast amount of free software and (more importantly) contributed to the creation of free standards that are free software friendly (think of OpenSocial vs. Facebook, or Android vs iPhone/Windows Mobile).

hunger's picture
Submitted by hunger on

Ha! I knew there was a reason I didn't mention that the first time around. Thanks for keeping me in check!

maravind's picture
Submitted by maravind on

Google is there in the list??

I'm sure they do tremendous modification for their cluster systems: GFS sorta stuff. But hardly do one see such things being released. Also, Picassa, Google earth, and bunch of other google goodies (Google toolbar and desktop widgets JUST came to GNU/Linux, but then..).. Google can't exactly be counted as a FLOSS hero.

JWZ was also a great FLOSS contributer.. there was Netscape (I know.. not exactly free), XEmacs, and the awesome XScreeSaver!!

Then there's Jon Johansen (the DeCSS guy). If BitTorrent is there, then he too should be mentioned.. He brought in the real concept of Freedom to Gnu/Linux world, IMO.

Anyway, great list.. keep it up!!

GNU/Linux is _not_ a free operating system...
...its a _priceless_ operating system!

jnareb's picture
Submitted by jnareb on

Wikipedia’s software is available under a free license (GPL). Yes, that’s the same license created by Richard Stallman (see above). While Wikipedia itself is not free software, [...]

Wikipedia is not a software, period. Saying that it is not a free software can imply that it is proprietary software.

Wikipedia's software (engine) is called MediaWiki, and is GPL licensed, while Wikipedia's content was originally GDL (GNU Documentation License) licensed, but nowadays it is moving to CC-BY-SA 3.0, one of Creative Commons licenses. Current phrasing might lead to confusion.

npv's picture
Submitted by npv on

Any other software heroes,other than this ?

Author information

Tony Mobily's picture

Biography

Tony is the founder and the Editor In Chief of Free Software Magazine

Most forwarded

Interview with Dave Mohyla, of DTIDATA

Dave Mohyla is the president and founder of dtidata.com, a hard drive recovery facility based in Tampa, Florida.

TM: Where are you based? What does your company do?
DTI Data recovery is based in South Pasadena, Florida which is a suburb of Tampa. We have been here for over 10 years. We operate a bio-metrically secured class 100 clean room where we perform hard drive recovery on all types of hard disks, from laptop hard drives to multi drive RAID systems.

Anybody up to writing good directory software?

Since the very beginning, directories (of any kind) have had a very central role in the internet. (I have recently grown fond of Free Web Directory. Even Slashdot can be considered a directory: a collection of great news and invaluable user-generated comments. As far as software is concerned, doing a quick search on Google about software directories will return the free (as in freedom) software directories like Savannah, SourceForge, Freshmeat and so on, followed by shareware and freeware sites such as FileBuzz, PCWin Download Center and All Freeware (great if you're looking for shareware and freeware, but definitely less comprehensive than their free-as-in-freedom counterparts).

Interview with Mark Shuttleworth

Mark Shuttleworth is the founder of Thawte, the first Certification Authority to sell public SSL certificates. After selling Thawte to Verisign, Mark moved on to training as an astronaut in Russia and visiting space. Once he got back he founded Ubuntu, the leading GNU/Linux distribution. He agreed on releasing a quick interview to Free Software Magazine.

Is better education the key to finding better software?

I read David Jonathon's article Anybody Up To Writing Good Directory Software? the other day, which got me thinking about software directories in general. As David mentioned, many of the software directories one finds when doing a quick google search are free as in beer, not as in freedom. But what interests me is the software directories that already exist, providing a combination of both free as in beer software, and open source software. Sites such as Freeware Downloads and Shareware Download don't advertise themselves as providing free as in liberty software, but each of them have a good selection of open source software available... if you know where to look.

Most emailed

Free Open Document label templates

If you’ve ever spent hours at work doing mailings, cursed your printer for printing outside the lines on your labels, or moaned “There has got to be a better way to do this,” here’s the solution you’ve been looking for. Working smarter, not harder! Worldlabel.com, a manufacture of labels offers Open Office / Libre Office labels templates for downloading in ODF format which will save you time, effort, and (if you want) make really cool-looking labels

Creating a user-centric site in Drupal

A little while ago, while talking in the #drupal mailing list, I showed my latest creation to one of the core developers there. His reaction was "Wow, I am always surprised what people use Drupal for". His surprise is somehow justified: I did create a site for a bunch of entertainers in Perth, a company set to use Drupal to take over the world with Entertainers.Biz.

Update: since writing this article, I have updated the system so that the whole booking process happens online. I will update the article accordingly!

So, why, why do people and companies develop free software?

More and more people are discovering free software. Many people only do so after weeks, or even months, of using it. I wonder, for example, how many Firefox users actually know how free Firefox really is—many of them realise that you can get it for free, but find it hard to believe that anybody can modify it and even redistribute it legally.

When the discovery is made, the first instinct is to ask: why do they do it? Programming is hard work. Even though most (if not all) programmers are driven by their higher-than-normal IQs and their amazing passion for solving problems, it’s still hard to understand why so many of them would donate so much of their time to creating something that they can’t really show off to anybody but their colleagues or geek friends.

Sure, anybody can buy laptops, and just program. No need to get a full-on lab or spend thousands of dollars in equipment. But... is that the full story?

Fun articles

Santa Claus - the most successful open source project

It dawned on me the other day, as I was shopping for the dozens of gifts it seems I have to buy every December, that Santa Claus is the most successful open source project in history. (Bridget @ Illiterarty would agree with that). Santa Claus is essentially a marketing development that is embodied by everyone who stuffs a sock, gives a gift, hosts a dinner or wishes Merry Christmas over the holiday season.

Most emailed

Editorial

When I first started thinking about Free Software Magazine, I was feeling enthusiastic about the dream. I had Dave, Gianluca, and Alan willing to help me, I had established members of the free software community willing to help me out, I had writers volunteering their time and energy for free, and I had a generous offer from OpenHosting for servers, all before I'd proved myself. There was a sense of excitement in the air, and I thought maybe, just maybe, I could make this work.

Free Software Magazine uses Apollo project management software and CRM for its everyday activities!