VirtualBox update fixes problems, makes the virtualization... http://t.co/rcgCpbS1Co #Article #FreeSoftware #KnowYourPC #Virtualization
what do you enjoy more: fundraising tweets or #freesoftware and #opendata. vote here: http://t.co/YIKs6fBXFQ
VirtualDVD lets you mount any disc image as a virtual drive http://t.co/LdswdJjR0P #Article #DigitalMedia #FreeSoftware #KnowYourPC
#freesoftware Ashampoo Video Styler - In Styler Video Software Program Video Styling Tool Fr... http://t.co/P21vSLvBhT #giveawayoftheday
#FreeSoftware Ashampoo Video Styler 2013 Ashampoo Video Styler is the ideal program to jazz… http://t.co/uO2PSS2puK
(Software Gratis) ESET Smart Security 5 Free 90 days Username and Password http://t.co/1Np1rnmNaz #FreeSoftware
WinCDEmu is an... http://t.co/HvaEHZFJSY #CDemulator #CDImageconverter #Diskemulation #freesoftware #ISOmounting #OpenSourceSoftware
Downloads the whole Adobe Cs2 package for free and legally :O thanks adobe #freesoftware #gift #oldsoftware
100% Give Away: Software Packages To Generate Massive Waves Of Traffic To Your Website http://t.co/FvPRLhPT7C via @worldprofit
Who Else Wants Start Their Own High Demand -eBook- Software Empire From Scratch, Without Any Programming Skills?! http://t.co/Z7R4C5AOJK
Novell's arguments are clear and powerful. "A reasonable jury could find that Microsoft's conduct was anticompetitive because it harmed Novell, was not competition on the merits, and was reasonably capable of contributing significantly to maintaining Microsoft's monopoly power in the operating systems market," Novell writes. Nowhere, it says, does Microsoft defend Microsoft's conduct as competition on the merits. And Microsoft's brief neglected to mention to the appeals court, or respond to, the District Court's conclusion that a jury could have found Microsoft's justifications for its conduct "to be pretextual." Worse, Microsoft is asking the appeals court to confer immunity on it "for deception of competitors regardless of the effect on competition."
By withdrawing its support for namespace extension APIs, Microsoft destroyed Novell's economic viability, and it did it on purpose to harm a competitor. The Bill Gates email [PDF] proves it, they believe. The whole point of documenting APIs and releasing betas is to induce reliance, so Microsoft can't credibly argue that it didn't know this change on its part would impact Novell negatively.
And again, as in Novell's opening brief (p. 38, footnote 5), Novell references Microsoft using a "deceptive script" which it says is mentioned in the email thread in which a Microsoft employee reported to his company that WordPerfect appeared to be "OK" with the change. Novell says was used to justify the change and persuade companies like Novell that Microsoft had to make the change. (Cf. this Groklaw article and this email thread [PDF] for context.) I'm sure we'll hear more about this at oral argument. So if you attend the event, and I know some of you are trying to make arrangements to attend, please watch for this in particular.
And then Novell says Microsoft ignored a great deal of the evidence that favors Novell, and so did the District Court, but the applicable standard for summary judgment under Rule 50 is that the court was required to view the evidence in the light most favorable to Novell, which it failed to do. Microsoft also ignored evidence that its conduct harmed competition in the operating systems market, including evidence from binding Findings of Fact from the US v. Microsoft case, and the testimony and statements of Microsoft executives (cf. Groklaw). And finally, Microsoft disregarded applicable substantive law, Novell argues.