Before reading further... Are you looking for great Linux hosting from a company that cares about GNU/Linux? Pick Dreamhost hosting, get a 10% bonus to the disk space (and support Free Software Magazine in the meantime!)
The Government of South Africa has joined the movement!
- 2007-03-06
-
Write a full post in response to this!
The Government of South Africa has just adopted, via government policy, a FLOSS approach to software development for government systems. FLOSS is FOSS with Libre added.
I stumbled across this news item the other day and see that a lobbying process for FOSS adoption had been underway by a number of groups including the Open Source Centre of The Meraka Institute. The mission of the Open Source Centre is to facilitate and catalyse the process of changing the dominant culture from one of passive consumer of proprietary solutions, developed in the first world, to one of proactive producer of appropriate innovative solutions, tailored to the local needs. This will result in a Southern Africa based digital commons (Meraka) - an enabler for localised FLOSS, open content and related resources. Through the lobbying of this organization and others including Sangonet (one of very few NGOs in Africa involved in the field of information communication technologies) the government joined the movement!
On the 22nd of February the South Africa Government approved a policy and strategy for the implementation of Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) in government. All new software developed for or by the government will in future be based on open standards and government will migrate all current software to FOSS.
What I think is fantastic about this is not just the move towards FOSS by government, but that they’ve listened to the lobbyists. Sounds strange that I’d say that since government and lobbyists go hand in hand in general, but here you have lobbyists fighting for an issue which has no mega corporate structure behind it, but is a movement supported by volunteer labour, non-proprietary orientation, collaboration and a very democratic spirit. It’s a little inspiring that it worked.
On that note it also interesting to see what’s happening FOSS wise in Europe as well and last fall the European Union released a report the “Study on the Economic impact of open source software on innovation and the competitiveness of the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) sector in the EU”
The summary results of that study include that FOSS is growing quickly in Europe and the market share for FOSS systems is higher in the EU than in the US, that public sector organizations in the EU are heavily embedded with FOSS but may be soon overtaken by Asia and Latin America, that Europe is the leading region for collaborating FLOSS software developers, and leads in terms of global project leaders.
I think the policy suggestions by the group responsible for the report are worth noting.
- Avoid penalising FLOSS in innovation and R&D incentives, public R&D funding and public software procurement that is currently often anti-competitive
- Support FLOSS in pre-competitive research and standardization
- Avoid lifelong vendor lock-in in educational systems by teaching students skills, not specific applications; encourage participation in FLOSS-like communities
- Encourage partnerships between large firms, SMEs and the FLOSS community
- Provide equitable tax treatment for FLOSS creators: FLOSS software contributions can be treated as charitable donations for tax purposes. Where this is already possible, spread awareness among firms, contributors and authorities.
- Explore how unbundling between hardware and software can lead to a more competitive market and ease forms of innovation that are not favoured by vertical integration.
This continuing movement towards supporting free software (as in open) is very exciting and an adoption by governments of these policies could have a profound effect on how software is developed, distributed, used and who benefits.
Write a full post in response to this!
Similar articles
Do you like this post?
Vote for it!
Copyright information
This entry is (C) Copyright by its author, 2004-2008. Unless a different license is specified in the entry's body, the following license applies: "Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved and appropriate attribution information (author, original site, original URL) is included".
Biography
Chris Holt: Chris Holt specializes in consulting for Government and NGO public health and social services organizations about software to assist with case management and patient management systems. Check out his site at http://www.intuitech.biz.
- Chris Holt's posts
- Login or register to post comments
- 2705 reads
- Printer friendly version (unavailable!)




Looking for Linux hosting, reviews, coupons, etc.? See out user-voted list
Best voted contents
-
Is Microsoft trying to kill Apache?
Gary Richmond, 2008-08-08 -
How do Drigg and Pligg compare?
Tony Mobily, 2008-08-17 -
The top 4 internet flame wars about free software
Andrew Min, 2008-08-16 -
Creating wealth with free software
Richard Rothwell, 2008-08-05
Similar entries
Buzz authors
All news
Other sites
- The Top 10 Everything (Dave). The good, the bad and the ugly.
- Free Software news (Dave & Bridget). All about free software -- free as in freedom!
- Book Reviews: Illiterarty (Bridget). Book reviews, blogs, and short stories.
Hot topics - last 60 days
-
Don't compare GNU/Linux with Windows or MacOS - they are not in the same game
Ryan Cartwright, 2008-07-07 -
Self-signed certificates and Firefox 3 - a possible solution
Ryan Cartwright, 2008-08-05 -
Dictators in free and open source software
Tony Mobily, 2008-07-22 -
Why sharing matters more than marketshare to GNU/Linux
Terry Hancock, 2008-08-01 -
Why did Javascript/AJAX mop the floor with Java, Flash and Silverlight? Or, why open standards eventually win
Tony Mobily, 2008-07-30
Hot topics - last 21 days
-
How do Drigg and Pligg compare?
Tony Mobily, 2008-08-17 -
The Bizarre Cathedral - 18
Ryan Cartwright, 2008-08-17 -
Is Microsoft trying to kill Apache?
Gary Richmond, 2008-08-08 -
An open letter to Barack Obama and the DNC (or, change video formats)
Anthony Taylor, 2008-08-27
Dedicated server
This is great!
Submitted by Anonymous visitor on Wed, 2007-03-07 18:16.
Vote!If only the folks in the United States could make as intelligent a decision....
South Africa will not regret this. The only ones who will regret it are Microsoft and their army of MCSE's that want to suck money out of that country over to Redmond.
I hope to see a mass of South African teachers, tech administrators, etc. on the K12LTSP mailing list!
spitz@cmosnetworks.com
Right again Anonymous!
Submitted by Chris Holt on Sun, 2007-03-11 06:27.
Vote!Can't agree more.
Great things are going to occur
Submitted by Anonymous visitor on Mon, 2007-03-12 12:13.
Vote!to South Africa's IT industry. Free software is all about allowing the user to empower themselves as well as encouraging the free flow of information.
Since a Free Software solution is unlikely to be completely adequate for the people's requirements, the government would have to hire the services of a solution provider, and the government would most likely hire the services of local companies thus, money would stay within the country as opposed to relying on foreign companies to provide solutions. Local businesses are most likely to understand the government's requirements and are probably more suited to solving problems that are unique to their own government.
IT companies are free to learn from and contribute towards the existing pool of freely available knowledge. This can lead to an improvement to a company's reputation, experience and expertise; just by drawing upon available knowledge and releasing the resulting solution to their users. People will also need to be trained to be able to provide these solutions and so, the local education industry would also need to be able to provide for this.
All this finally leads to a stronger overall economy as the result of allowing users to empower themselves as well as allowing information to be shared.
Freedom
Submitted by guydjohnston on Tue, 2007-03-13 18:03.
Vote!I completely agree. I think the main benefit of free software is freedom, rather than cost-cutting, which usually seems to be the only benefit governments talk about when promoting "open source" (especially here in the UK).
--
GNU - free as in freedom
Freedom
Submitted by Chris Holt on Fri, 2007-03-16 21:01.
Vote!I often feel the freedom we discuss is somewhat different than the freedom espoused by the White House :)