Sun Ultra 20 M2 review
A powerful workstation from a mainstream vendor for a reasonable price
Download the whole article as PDF
Short URL: http://fsmsh.com/1806
Write a full post in response to this!
Just don’t expect that peace to last if you provide it with a big complicated processing job, those fans can kick in with a jolt that wakes you up.
Operating system support
As with any Intel/AMD based PC the range of operating systems supported is suitably large, including Sun’s own Solaris 10 or OpenSolaris, GNU/Linux, BSD and many others. Sun officially provide drivers for the Red Hat Enterprise Linux, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server/Desktop and Microsoft Windows. I tried Solaris, Red Hat, SUSE and Windows on this machine.
It should be fairly self-evident that Sun’s own Solaris is the preferred solution for the machine. The unit came installed with everything working, but I’ve had to wait for a few revisions of the driver CD to replicate this situation on later installations. Version 1.5 of the CD seems to work fine.
I’m a big fan of Solaris, and have been since I started using it 15 years ago. The latest incarnation, Solaris 10, includes some significant improvements, including improved network performance (a feature I’ve been able to take advantage of during testing), support for Solaris Containers (virtualized operating system units), and a host of improvements in the desktop environment for those people using Solaris as their main computer.
Using Solaris also enables you to take advantage of the bundled software, which includes Sun Java Studio Creator 2, Sun Java Studio Enterprise, the NetBeans IDE and Sun Studio 11. This is a rich combination, ideal for those users developing Java applications, and, with Sun Studio 11, C/C++ and Fortran applications. I’ve been using Sun Studio 11 for a while now and have found it a excellent alternative to GNU gcc.
Of course, since Solaris is one of the oldest Unix variants, you can download and install a host of other applications, including all the GNU tools, Firefox, Thunderbird, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and many others. Some of these are provided as standard, and others are available on a CD provided with the machine. I haven’t had any trouble manually building any of the typical free software solutions for use on Solaris either, and there are many sites, such as SunFreeware and Blastwave that will provide these solutions for you if you want them.
Beyond Solaris, I was impressed with the level of support when using both the Red Hat and SUSE Linux variants. The drivers that Sun supplied provide enhanced video driver support that make X fly. I have to admit to not being a regular user of either distribution—I use Gentoo or Kubuntu by choice—but I ran both distributions for over a month while doing a variety of tasks, from software development, through web site developing (including testing a deployment that uses the LAMP stack) and more general web browsing and writing duties.
Beyond Solaris, I was impressed by both the Red Hat and SUSE Linux variants
The only issue I came across was a small problem with Red Hat not always shutting down properly. SUSE didn’t seem to exhibit the same problem, so I don’t take this as an indication of a fault with the box.
Running Microsoft Windows was also impressive, especially when taking full advantage of the fast graphics card and trying out some 3D software and the occasional game. The ability to run Windows, especially as a dual- or multi-boot system with your other OS of choice is a big advantage.
Performance
Measuring performance is an art of course, and I decided to look at the performance in two different ways. The first is by using a standardized performance measuring tool (GeekBench), and the second is just to look at the machine in terms of how it feels and runs in use.
Geekbench results
The Geekbench performance measuring tool has a key advantage over many of the other tools available in that it is designed to test a range of functionality and is able to do this in a standardized method across many different operating systems. This can be useful, not only to compare different machines, but also to compare different operating systems on the same machine.
I decided to try the Ultra 20 M2 with Windows XP, Solaris and Red Hat Enterprise Linux. I also compared this to a 24” iMac (with the T7600, 2.33GHz CPU) running Mac OS X.
I ran the tests 10 times and then took an average of the results. The overall scores were as follows:
| Machine | Platform | Avg. Score | Low | High |
| Ultra 20 M2 | Solaris | 272.08 | 270.1 | 273.1 |
| Ultra 20 M2 | Red Hat EL | 252.35 | 250.73 | 253.51 |
| Ultra 20 M2 | Windows | 289.68 | 282.3 | 291.7 |
| iMac | OS X | 245.75 | 243.0 | 249.4 |
GeekBench results
Write a full post in response to this!
Similar articles
Do you like this post?
Vote for it!
Copyright information
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.
Biography
Martin Brown: Martin “MC” Brown is a member of the documentation team at MySQL and freelance writer. He has worked with Microsoft as an Subject Matter Expert (SME), is a featured blogger for ComputerWorld, a founding member of AnswerSquad.com, Technical Director of Foodware.net and, and has written books on topics as diverse as Microsoft Certification, iMacs, and free software programming.
- Login or register to post comments
- 29858 reads
- Printer friendly version (unavailable!)




Best voted contents
-
Linux performance: is Linux becoming just too slow and bloated?
Mitch Meyran, 2010-01-26 -
The Bizarre Cathedral - 66
Ryan Cartwright, 2010-02-01 -
Save "Sita Sings the Blues" from the Flash format: can you convert FLA?
Terry Hancock, 2010-01-29 -
The Morevna Project: Anime with Synfig and Blender
Terry Hancock, 2010-02-08
Buzz authors
Free Software news
- Free software every day. http://is.gd/5GMLi #warez #download #software #ingyensoftware #freesoftware
- Friss, új programok az oldalon. http://is.gd/5GMLi #warez #download #software #ingyensoftware #freesoftware
- You should be limited only by your hardware, not by crap software or financial burden. via @psyphen #truedat #freesoftware #goodgnus
- Discovered http://nakedcomputers.org/ - listing retailers of PCs without an OS. Enabling you to put your own on. #freesoftware #linux
- Just added myself to the http://wefollow.com twitter directory under: #chengdu_china #freesoftware #opensource #b... http://bit.ly/aQUevU
Other sites
- The Top 10 Everything (Dave). The good, the bad and the ugly.
- Free Software news (Dave & Bridget). All about free software -- free as in freedom!
- Book Reviews: Illiterarty (Bridget). Book reviews, blogs, and short stories.
Hot topics - last 60 days
-
Open Science and climategate: The IPCC/CRU needs to take a leaf out of CERN's Book
Gary Richmond, 2009-12-16 -
Linux performance: is Linux becoming just too slow and bloated?
Mitch Meyran, 2010-01-26 -
Web code is already open - why not make it free as well
Ryan Cartwright, 2010-01-20 -
Save "Sita Sings the Blues" from the Flash format: can you convert FLA?
Terry Hancock, 2010-01-29 -
Mastering a DVD using QDVDAuthor
Terry Hancock, 2010-01-08
Hot topics - last 21 days
-
Linux performance: is Linux becoming just too slow and bloated?
Mitch Meyran, 2010-01-26 -
Web code is already open - why not make it free as well
Ryan Cartwright, 2010-01-20 -
Save "Sita Sings the Blues" from the Flash format: can you convert FLA?
Terry Hancock, 2010-01-29 -
The Open-PC: one step closer to open-hardware
Ryan Cartwright, 2010-01-20
Odiogo
Free Software Magazine uses Apollo, project management and CRM for its everyday activities!

Mac Pro
Submitted by Clay Garland (not verified) on Tue, 2007-06-05 13:29.
Vote!The article seems relatively misleading. You've done all your tests on a computer with 4GB of ECC Memory, 2 250 GB HD's, and an opteron 1200 CPU, yet you say prices *start* at $845. Well, What does the $845 get you? It certainly doesn't get you a Dual Core Opteron at 2.8 I know the newer models of those chips retail for 2 grand or more, and even the Italy model is almost $800 retail. But still, for my money, and I do a lot of database and software development in *nix and Windows, nothing beats the value that the Mac Pro gives me. Support for 32 GB of ram, 4 Drive Bays, an extremely sturdy enclosure with excellent cooling characteristics. And on top of that, I can get 4 Cores, for about three grand with the specs you list, and 8 cores for four thousand. It would be nice to know how much a configuration like the one you used costs for comparison's sake.
Costings
Submitted by Martin Brown on Wed, 2007-06-06 09:29.
Vote!Hi,
Check this page: http://shop.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/Sun_NorthAmerica-Sun_Store_US-Site/en_US/-/USD/ViewStandardCatalog-Browse?CategoryName=Sun_Blade_2500_Work&CategoryDomainName=Sun_NorthAmerica-Sun_Store_US-SunCatalog
$845 will get you an AMD Opteron 1210 (dual-core 1.8GHz), 512MB RAM, 160GB HD
$2245 will get you an AMD Opteron 1218 (dual-core, 2.6 GHz), 1GB RAM, 250GB HD
As I state in the article, my unit came with a single 250GB SATA HD, not two.
The 20 M2 *is* limited to 4GB RAM, but then it's the lower end configuration. The Ultra 40 M2 is the dual-core, dual CPU model, with a unit with two 2222SE Opteron's, 4GB RAM and a 146GB SAS disk at $5495. (http://shop.sun.com/is-bin/INTERSHOP.enfinity/WFS/Sun_NorthAmerica-Sun_Store_US-Site/en_US/-/USD/ViewStandardCatalog-Browse?CategoryName=Sun_Blade_2500_Work&CategoryDomainName=Sun_NorthAmerica-Sun_Store_US-SunCatalog)