LastPass improves security and launches new Windows 8 app:... http://t.co/tMvl0dXK #Article #FreeSoftware #KnowYourPC |http://t.co/rBRuAeYo

lunedì proverò a chiedere ai politici una opinione sul #freesoftware dicendo che ho già chiesto ad un loro avversario! #giochipsicologici

LibreOffice 4 is out! Grab it here --> http://t.co/LduVz0j2 #FreeSoftware

I hope you were not expecting too much from today's en banc hearing by the Federal Circuit on CLS Bank v. Alice. A split decision is the best we can hope for, according to Bloomberg's report on the day's festivities, Google Joins JPMorgan in Seeking Software Patent Limits, quoting a patent lawyer, Brad Wright: Based on their questions and their past rulings, the judges seemed divided, said Brad Wright, a patent lawyer with Banner & Witcoff in Washington who attended the hearing. "The court appears fractured and a split decision is likely," Wright said. Fractured. Indeed. Le mot juste. A split decision is what Mark Lemley predicted, as well.

I have collected a couple of other reports on the hearing, and then we have our own. Ours is hilarious, in the way that only geek pain plus indignation plus despair plus a touch of amazement at tech cluelessness can provide.

Yes. Another 'is software patentable' case. Or is this patent so blazingly obvious it is invalid? If so, how about if the patent claims the magic happens when folks do it "using a computer"?

Encore une belle connerie du gouvernement! - Pas d’appel d’offres http://t.co/6UhAwEOy #Fail #FreeSoftware #LogicielLibre

LastPass improves security and launches new Windows 8 app http://t.co/JoRGGxEu #Article #FreeSoftware #KnowYourPC #Privacy #Security

#IWEEE 2013 presentations #freesoftware #ehealth #phealth #GNUHealth http://t.co/zu5NE1zZ

#LibreOffice4 released. http://t.co/ut0dnbNA #LibreOffice #freesoftware #softwarelibre #opensource #códigoabierto #codigoabierto #TDF

#FreeSoftware Ashampoo Snap 5 Whether it’s at work, at school, at home or anywhere else… http://t.co/DL46Sn7Q

#freesoftware Ashampoo Snap 5 - Screen Snap Application Tool | Capture Screenshot & Video Pres... http://t.co/KE9EHnmk #giveawayoftheday

LibreOffice 4.0 Available For Download http://t.co/WhfuBI04 Woo Hoo! #opensource #foss #freesoftware

RT @freeculture: Announcing the Empowermentors Collective for Women of Color & Queer People of Color in #freeculture and #freesoftwa ...

RT @freeculture: Announcing the Empowermentors Collective for Women of Color & Queer People of Color in #freeculture and #freesoftwa ...

GIMP 2.8.4 adds improvements and polish to the popular... http://t.co/TKowxy0i #Article #FreeSoftware #KnowYourPC |http://t.co/rBRuAeYo

The... http://t.co/1pbM9NRf #biglots #dollarstore #familydollar #freesoftware #freeware #microwavepopcorn #openoffice #savemoney

Judge James Robart in the Microsoft v. Motorola litigation in Seattle has ruled now on Microsoft's partial summary judgment motion that they held the hearing about last week. He has -- surprise, surprise -- once again ruled for Microsoft. He has not yet ruled on the other issue the hearing was about, the issue of the Google license agreement with MPEG LA.

I agree with him in the abstract, so to speak, that software patents require increased disclosure. He has ruled that the means-plus-function software patents Motorola was using in this litigation are, without specifically disclosed algorithms, invalid in that he decided the algorithms claimed were insufficient as vague: Accordingly, where the disclosed structure corresponding to a means-plus-function element is a computer-implemented algorithm, the algorithmic structure must be disclosed....

Because neither the examples of a decoder, nor the definition of a decoder, identified in the specification amount to anything more than a programmed general computer or a functional description, the court requires disclosure of an algorithm corresponding to the "means for decoding" and "means for using" limitations....Although the specification describes how one of skill in the art would ascertain what blocks to consider when decoding, the specification provides no guidance as to how one of ordinary skill would actually decode the considered blocks. Thus, the court concludes that the specification contains no disclosure that supports Motorola's proposed algorithm (or any other algorithm) for corresponding structure to the decoding function required by the "means for selectively decoding" limitation of claim 13 of the '375 Patent. Means plus function claims are exactly what the USPTO is asking the software community to comment on, with the view to improving software patents, and one suggestion we at Groklaw are sending in is the need for increased disclosure, and not just for the type of patent the judge thinks needs more specific disclosure. But if the world decides that any time the patent says something like "on a computer" that you need to provide specific algorithms, so be it. From his mouth to God's ears, as they say.

You doubt that software patents need to go? Look at all the trouble they are causing.

100% Give Away: Software Packages To Generate Massive Waves Of Traffic To Your Website http://t.co/PZP6v60I via @worldprofit

RT @freeculture: Announcing the Empowermentors Collective for Women of Color & Queer People of Color in #freeculture and #freesoftwa ...

#RStallman spares no stage for promoting #FreeSoftware and #GNU. #NMWk5 #RevOS

Silverstripe wins govt contract http://t.co/RtVPXOr9 #EconomyWorkampWelfare #freesoftware #governmentprocurement